Homeworks writing service

Meaning of our work by cheikh anta diop

I do not write out of an atavistic nature. I meaning of our work by cheikh anta diop not romantic about Africa's glorious past. What is important is that meaning of our work by cheikh anta diop try and connect our pre- colonial past to our present, and see how we can start to reconstruct our lives which was devastated by Europeans.

We have to reclaim our history and our culture. The Asians have successfully done this; I believe that Africans can do the same. Racism used to be a tri-polar thing. Europeans put themselves at the top, from where they look down on the Asians and the Africans. The Asians have successfully rescued themselves. No European today look down upon the Asians. Racism has all but become a bi-polar affair; Africans remain the only race being humiliated by Euro-Americans.

Much of what makes civilization had already existed for thousands of years in Egypt and Mesopotamia, and had spread thence to neighboring countries. But certain elements had been lacking until the Greeks supplied them. What they achieved in art and literature is familiar to everybody, but what they did in the purely intellectual realm is even more exceptional.

They invented mathematics and science and philosophy; they first wrote history as opposed to mere annals; they speculated freely about the nature of the World and the ends of life, without being bound in the fetters of any inherited orthodoxy. What occurred was so astonishing that, until very recent times, men were content to gape and talk mystically about the Greek genius. It is possible, however, to understand the development of Greece in scientific terms, and it is well worth while to do so.

By such clever semantic acrobatics, Bertrand Russell, like many Western scholars, think they have succeeded in ascribing an ingenuity to the ancient Greek, which the Greeks neither claim nor deserve.

NADMO Admits Distribution Of Expired Foods

Only buffoons, untutored in history, could gape at the so-called genius of the Greeks. Greek civilization, however impressive and astonishing, cannot, and should, never be situated outside the civilizations Egypt and Phoenician that preceded it. Greek Civilization didn't spring up, suddenly, mythically, as Bertrand Russell and other western scholars would like us to believe. The Greeks borrowed, stole, plagiarized ideas from those ancient civilizations.

And why is it often forgotten that the Ionians who later became Greeks were former vassals of Egypt and later Persians? The Egyptian invented mathematics, which Mr. Russell decided to denigrate meaning of our work by cheikh anta diop, 'form of rule of thumbs.

So much for the so-called 'Father meaning of our work by cheikh anta diop mathematics! Aristotle and Plato borrowed their ideas from the Egyptian - although without giving any credit. No less a personage than Herodotus meaning of our work by cheikh anta diop that Greece borrowed from Egypt all the elements of her civilization, even the cults of her gods. We have to ask Bertrand Russell how a people could build something as imposing as the pyramids without a working meaning of our work by cheikh anta diop of trigonometry and geometry!

The Papyrus of Moscow and the Rhind Papyrus greatly enrich meaning of our work by cheikh anta diop knowledge of these facts. When it is not sufficient to ascribe any notion of ingenuity on the ancient Greeks, Western scholars fall back on an old-trick, looking for a mythical White origin of the Egyptian civilization - the most impressive of all ancient civilizations. Anthropology was the 'scientific' discipline they spawned to spread their falsehoods.

Egypt has to be painted White. So jaundiced is the West that this man, who almost single-handedly rewrote the history of the World at least the Black world remain relatively unknown to the world. Regrettably not many Africans know anything about this brilliant scholar, who did so much to debunk the lies of a White Egypt and re-trace the antiquity of Black history, distorted by colonialists and imperialist ideologists masquerading as scholars.

He was a nuclear physicist, anthropologist, historian and, until his death, Director of the Radio-carbon laboratory he founded. The world of history, anthropology and Egyptology has never been the same again since Anta Diop published his great work, 'The African Origin of Civilization, Myth or Reality?

The history of Black Africa will remain suspended in air and cannot be written correctly until African historians dare to connect it with the history of Egypt. The whole world has been fed on the fallacy of an Egyptian civilization, built by a White race.

Anta Diop was called all sorts of names, not at all pleasant ones. He was accused of being a romantic African - the usual staple. Today, what interests me most is to see the formation of teams, not of passive readers, but of honest, bold research workers, allergic to complacency and busy substantiating and exploring ideas expressed in our work, such as: In particular, the study of languages, institutions, and so forth, cannot be treated properly; in a word, it will be impossible to build Africa humanities, a body of African human sciences, so long as that relationship does not appear legitimate.

The African historian who evades the problems of Egypt is neither modest nor objective, nor unruffled; he is ignorant, cowardly, and neurotic. Imagine, if you can, the uncomfortable position of a western meaning of our work by cheikh anta diop who wants to write the history of Europe without referring to Greco-Latin Antiquity and try to pass that off as a scientific approach.

The moral fruit of their civilization is to be counted among the assets of the Black world. Instead of presenting itself to history as an insolvent debtor, that Black world is the very initiator of 'western' civilization flaunted before our eyes today. Pythagorean mathematics, the theory of the four elements of Thales of Miletus, Epicurean materialism, Platonic idealism, Judaism, Islam, and modern science are rooted in Egyptian cosmogony and science. One needs only to mediate on Osiris, the redeemer- god, who sacrifice himself, dies, and is resurrected to save mankind, a figure essentially identifiable with Christ.

Osiris at the tribunal of the dead is indeed the 'lord' of revealed religions, sitting enthroned on Judgement Day, and we know that certain Biblical passages are practically copies of Egyptian moral texts.

Far be it from me to confuse this brief reminder with a demonstration. It is simply a matter of providing a few landmarks to persuade the incredulous Black African reader to bring himself to verify this. To his great surprise and satisfaction, he will discover that most of the ideas used today to domesticate, atrophy, dissolve, or steal his "soul," were conceived by his own ancestors. To become conscious of that fact is perhaps the first step toward a genuine retrieval of himself; without it, intellectual sterility is the general rule, or else the creations bear I know not what imprint of the subhuman.

In a word, we must restore the historical consciousness of the African people and reconquer a Promethean consciousness. Anthropologically and culturally speaking, the Semitic world was born during protohistoric times from the mixture of white-skinned and black- skinned people in Western Asia. This is why an understanding of the Mesopotamian Semitic world, Judaic or Arabic, requires constant reference to the underlying Black reality.

If certain Biblical passages, especially in meaning of our work by cheikh anta diop Old Testament, seem absurd, this is because specialists puffed up with prejudices, are unable to accept documentary evidence.

The triumph of the monogenetic thesis of humanity Leakeyeven at the stages of "Homo sapiens-sapiens," compels one to admit that all races descended from the Black race, according to a filiation process that science will one day explain. To answer this mother of all questions, Anta Diop didn't rely on conjectures. He went straight to quote ancient sources.

He quoted Herodotus, the Greek historian whom Western scholars love to call the 'father of history' who informed us that: Western scholars also like to use the Bible to support their arguments, again whenever it serves their purposes. And Anta Diop reminded us that, according to the Bible, Egypt was peopled by the offspring of Ham, ancestors of the Blacks!

The Egyptian called their country Kemit, which means 'black' in their language. That was the origin of the word, Ham. If Old Egypt was indeed established by the Whites, there should be, at least, some surviving elements to connect them to the Western world.

Is this the case? In contrast to the Western scholars who had searched in vain for a shred of evidence to support a white origin of the Egyptian civilization, Anta Diop presented eight cogent argument to support his thesis of a Black origin: Totemism totem - 'an object that has a ritual association': No part of the Western world, as far as we know, used totem.

The African Origin Of Civilization: Myth Or Reality? By Cheikh Anta Diop

Ancient Egypt was a totemic society, as is most of Africa, up meaning of our work by cheikh anta diop today.

To counter the argument of a Semitic origin of circumcision, Anta Diop reminded us that, according to the Bible, Abraham was circumcised when he was already ninety years old; and that was after he married a Black woman, Hagar, the mother of Ishmael, the Biblical ancestor of the second Semitic branch, the Arabs.

Moses was not circumcised until he wed his Madianite wife. So much for the Semitic origin of circumcision. The institutions of kingship, down to the ritualistic killing of monarchs, was practiced by the Egyptians, as is still the case in some African societies today. To understand certain Egyptian concepts, one must refer to the Black world, as is attested by what we have said about kingship. The similarity of mores, customs, traditions, and thinking has already been sufficiently stressed by various authorities.

Perhaps it would take more than a lifetime to report all the analogies between Egypt and the meaning of our work by cheikh anta diop world, so true is it that they are one and the same. This is among the most remarkable traits of ancient Egypt that could still be found in Africa today.

Ancient Egypt was stratified as follows: In Africa today, we have a social order which is as follows: We should contrast this with the western society, where the institution of monarchy was a recent invention. This is perhaps the most telling trait shared by Old Egypt and Modern Africa. Egypt was a matriarchal society, so is most of Africa today - Islam and Christianity had withered the practice away in some part of the continent. Astigmatized western scholars have not been able to reconcile their contention that white people build the civilization in Egypt, and the simple fact that the society these whites were supposed to have built was organized on matriarchal line, in sharp contrast to much of the western world which remain, until today, rigidly patriarchal.

Kinship of the Meroitic Sudan and Egypt: There are some evidence to suggest a Sudanese Nubia origin of the Egyptian civilization. Nubia is undoubtedly older than Egypt, and the migration was south-north. This argument is supported by the fact that all the objects of worship in Egypt are Nubian. Among others, the oldest pyramids are located in present day Sudan, a fact that western scholars are glossing meaning of our work by cheikh anta diop, since it will require their looking for a White origin.

Also glossed over is the fact that Nubian writing is more evolved than Egyptian writing - this does not conform with the 'experts' jaundiced view that African didn't have written language!

So long as there was no mention of a white ancestry, neither Herodotus, nor the Egyptian are qualified, in the eyes of the white scholars, to write their own history. Let's imagined an antique civilization at the northern part of Europe, how would one react to some Black scholars laying claim that that civilization was created by their ancestors?

Access Check

This meaning of our work by cheikh anta diop what white scholars want Africans to accept. With all seriousness, they have been pouring resources into discovering a mythical White origin of the Egyptian civilization. Egypt thus remain the only country in the world that has to justify its geography.

The question provoked by all the vain attempt to paint Egypt white is: Why would white people leave their heartland to go and found a civilization in Africa, and withdrew as miraculously as they came?

As Anta Diop wondered, 'No less paradoxical is the fact that the Indo-Europeans never created a civilization in their own native lands: