Homeworks writing service


An argument in favor of increasing military pay

Share6 Shares 721 When the draft was eliminated in 1973, most Americans were happy to see the divisive policy disappear.

What are the main arguments in favor of the privatization of public goods?

Compulsory military service—particularly during the Vietnam War—was a thing to be feared by those eligible and by their loved ones. However, there are several solid arguments in favor of reinstituting the draft. Among the many issues he noted was his claim that only 1 percent of American citizens serve or have an immediate family member serving in the military. This means that few will see firsthand the effects war has on those who fight.

Reinstituting the draft would broaden this connection, and in theory it could galvanize opposition to war and the support of peace to minimize exposure to the issues associated with fighting in a war. It could also result in a deeper understanding of the way the military functions and how it sets out to achieve foreign policy goals. This could unite the population in taking an educated position on any given war, regardless of whether they support or oppose it. Such declarations would almost certainly be opposed more strongly if they affected more than just the professional military the US currently employs.

The prevailing public perception seems to be that since military personnel have volunteered for service, they know they may become involved in military conflicts outside Congressional approval. Such methods an argument in favor of increasing military pay not nearly as likely to be an argument in favor of increasing military pay accepted by the general an argument in favor of increasing military pay if the president were sending draftees an argument in favor of increasing military pay war.

This creates a disproportionate burden, one that could be alleviated with the additional personnel the draft would create. The current situation sees many servicemen being deployed far too long, and there have been several instances in which a mental breakdown has caused the significant and unnecessary loss of civilian life.

The number of PTSD sufferers is staggering, as 20 percent of the returning veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars suffer from PTSD and other psychological issues caused by their traumatic experiences. Two years of an argument in favor of increasing military pay service from all US residents would allow us to meet both of these goals. Our military ranks would swell, and there would be no need to demand repeated service from our troops. This creates important perspective and understanding, and many believe this shared experience has blurred the lines drawn by class and race.

In the 40 years since 1974—2014the military has been deployed abroad 175 times. While several influencing factors relate to the use of the military abroad, politicians seem to have fewer reservations sending a volunteer army abroad rather than one composed of draftees.

It was this attitude that got us into the unnecessary and costly wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and that threatens to mire us in deadly wars in the future. We make decisions about war without worry over who fights them. Those who do the fighting have no choice; when the flag goes up, they salute and follow orders. Theoretically, draftees would have a choice and would still gain the sense of perspective and unity that so many draft supporters cite when suggesting compulsory national service.

The concept of the draft is closely associated with sending young Americans to war, but expanding it in this way would eliminate that association and allow national service to be valuable during both times of war and times of peace.

Service could be broadly defined to include the military, the Peace Corps, AmeriCorps, service in our public schools. There would be considerable advantages to our country and to these individuals, including bringing to bear the talent of many young people for national good, instilling in young adults a sense of citizenship and public service, an infusion of great talent into our public sector that needs it dearly.

American citizens are becoming increasingly apathetic with regard to their voice in representative government. In the 2014 midterm elections, just 36.

Most Voters Favor Defense Cuts. Most Politicians Don't.

The last time the turnout was so low was 1942, when a large portion of the voting public was fighting in World War II. Parker, the author of Fighting for Democracy: Black Veterans and the Struggle Against White Supremacy in the Postwar South, notes that an argument in favor of increasing military pay service plays an important symbolic role.

That burden includes casualties. That would include those who hold political office in the future, making them far less likely to pursue war, particularly if diplomacy could still be employed to avoid any type of conflict.

Thus might we reduce the risks of counsel from those who have never had to learn the difference between a war and a cakewalk. Francis Wolfe is a freelance writer whose work can be seen daily at Dodgers Today.