Homeworks writing service


What were the roots of the scientific revolution essay

In the development of the discipline the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the years from Copernicus to Newton, have been as important as they were in the development of science itself. Among historians of science.

They are almost universally known as the Scientific Revolution, because the fundamental changes they instituted in the conception of nature and the procedures of scientific inquiry effectively terminated a tradition what were the roots of the scientific revolution essay natural philosophy that stemmed from Aristotle and marked the birth of modern science.

How to cite this page

The history of science was largely created as an intellectual discipline through the study of this period. The men who created the Scientific Revolution were convinced that they were participating in a major upheaval of human thought. The philosophes of the Enlightenment were equally convinced.

They chose their heroes from the leaders of the Scientific Revolution, and they looked upon the period as the crucial turning point in history, when the first dawning of reason began to dispel the clouds of ignorance. Some of the fundamental books in the history of science, works that specialists in such areas as the history of mathematics and the history of astronomy cannot afford to ignore, were written during the eighteenth century, and what were the roots of the scientific revolution essay that time there has been a continuing tradition of scholarship on the Scientific Revolution.

Only in our own time, since the World War II, however, has the history of science become a recognized academic field with organized programs in universities and a population of historians of science multiplying almost as rapidly as scientists themselves. As the discipline has turned increasingly toward topics more recent than the seventeenth century, it has been able to draw upon the conceptual categories and the research techniques developed initially in the study of the Scientific Revolution.

For example, Thomas S. Chicago Press, 1962a book that has been influential what were the roots of the scientific revolution essay the history of science as well as inside it, drew heavily upon the concept of the scientific revolution for its general theory that the course of science has proceeded, not by gradual accretion of increments of knowledge, but by discontinuous transformations of the perception of nature.

Hence the period that was seminal in the growth of modern science has been equally seminal in the growth of the history of science. In this essay I have entirely omitted the early works, which were frequently addressed to a technically sophisticated audience.

I understand myself to be writing for a different audience, not only historians of science, but also general historians engaged for the most part in teaching Western history and concerned to include some treatment of the Scientific Revolution. I want to express my passionate desire to speak to this audience successfully.

The Scientific Revolution was the most important "event" in Western history, and a historical discipline that ignores it must have taken an unhappy step in the direction of antiquarianism. It has shaped most of the categories in terms of which we think, and in the process has frequently Subverted humanistic concepts that furnished the sinews of our civilization.

Through its influence on technology, it has helped to lift the burden of poverty from much of the Western world, but in doing what were the roots of the scientific revolution essay has accelerated our exploitation of the world's finite resources until already, not so long after the birth of modern science, We fear with good cause their exhaustion.

Through its transformation of what were the roots of the scientific revolution essay, science has removed the constant presence of illness and pain, but it has also produced toxic materials that poison the environment and weapons that threaten us with extinction.

It should be obvious that I consider some of the items on that list desirable and some highly undesirable. I am convinced that the list describes a large part of the reality of the late twentieth century and that nothing on it is thinkable without the Scientific Revolution of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Science and the Modem Mind: A What were the roots of the scientific revolution essay, edited by Gerald Holton Boston: There must what were the roots of the scientific revolution essay hundreds of other books devoted to similar themes, but I have yet to see the work that presents, in one integrated argument, the full position I just sketched so briefly, the position that offers the what were the roots of the scientific revolution essay justification for the inclusion of the history of science prominently in any academic course that presumes to explain the origins of the world in which we live.

Allow me to say, without excessive drama, that if I can encourage even a few historians to include more adequate treatment of the Scientific Revolution in their courses, so that students will emerge with a better appreciation of how we got where we are, I will have achieved what I hoped for with this teaching guide.

With the above ends in view, and wanting to raise as few obstacles as possible to a reader seeking a ready introduction to the field rather than the latest conclusions for the specialist, I have limited the bibliography to works in the English language including a number not published originally in Englishand I have tried to omit the most specialized works that were written in the first instance for other scholars.

I have marked a few of the books with an asterisk before the name of the author to indicate works whose level seems to me most adapted for use with an undergraduate audience. Those inclined to look further can easily find more detailed bibliographies in the books listed here and in the most recent general histories of the Scientific Revolution.

As I am writing, A. Hall, The Revolution in Science London: Longmans, 1983a revision of his earlier Scientific Revolution London: Longmans, Green, 1954thoroughly rewritten to incorporate the what were the roots of the scientific revolution essay scholarship published after the earlier work, contains the most up-to-date bibliography available.

For information on leading scientists of the period, consult the Dictionary of Scientific Biography, edited by Charles C. Each article in the DSB concludes with a bibliography. My list does not venture far into the enormous quantity of journal literature, but Isis, the official journal of the History of Science Society, annually publishes an exhaustive Critical Bibliography. Critical Bibliographies for the earlier years have been what were the roots of the scientific revolution essay in five volumes and indexed under a variety of headings in Isis Cumulative Bibliography 1913-65, edited by Magda Whitrow London: Mansell, 1971-1982 supplementary volumes covering subsequent ten-year periods are being edited by John Neu 1966-75, Mansell, 1980, 1985.

There is one other prefatory comment that I must make. Historians of science often distinguish between what they call internal and external history of science, history of science that focuses on the internal development of a system of thought about nature, and history of science that focuses on the external context within which nature is studied. Analogous distinctions exist, I believe, in every form of intellectual history.

There is a growing consensus that the distinction between the two schools has frequently been overdrawn. Internal historians of science do not deny the obvious truth that an activity carried on by individuals living in society has a valid social history, and external historians of science do not deny that the content of science is an essential part of the story.

Extemal or Internal Factors Lexington, Mass: Heath, 1968a volume in the Problems in European Civilization series, presents a summary of the debate on this issue. Although it is my goal in this bibliography not to introduce ideological factors, any selective list of books is bound to reflect the outlook of the person who compiled it.

Let me then state that until recently I have pursued my career as an historian of science almost entirely within the internal school, and the bibliography I present inevitably contains the books that have appeared most important to me. Let me add that in the development of the discipline, internal history of science came first. With a few notable exceptions, works on the external history of the scientific revolution have been more recent and are therefore fewer.

If books on history of scientific ideas predominate in my list, their numbers on library shelves do seem greater to me in roughly the same proportion. Burtt wrote one of the books that helped to revise our understanding of the Scientific Revolution, treating it not as a set of empirical discoveries, but as a reformulation of basic philosophical assumptions about the nature of physical reality--The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science New York: John Mepham; Atlantic Highlands, N.

Humanities Press, 1978 appeared. More than any other work, this book shaped the modern discipline of the history of science, as it moved several steps further in the direction that Burtt had gone.

The book was an exercise in internal history. His works pursue the problems of early modern science as the leading scientists defined them and analyze the conceptual developments in detail. Anyone interested in pursuing modern science as a system of thought can do no better than to start with him. Harper, 1957 explores the appearance of a new cosmology as one of the central features of the new conception of nature. He was also the prolific author of articles equally eloquent what were the roots of the scientific revolution essay influential, some of the most important of which have been collected in the volume Metaphysics and Measurement Cambridge, Mass.: Some of the earliest work in the history of the Scientific Revolution appeared in the Journal of the History of Ideas.

A number of histories of the Scientific Revolution trace its development from the early sixteenth to the late seventeenth century. The Origins of Modem Science London: Bell, 1949will probably never cease to be a valuable introduction to the topic and a testimony to the capacity of a historian without technical training in science to penetrate the history of science successfully and to contribute substantially to it.

Hall followed Butterfield with The Scientific Revolution see abovea somewhat comprehensive treatment of the subject With Marie Boas What were the roots of the scientific revolution essay, he also attempted to launch a multivolume general history of science.

Harper, 1962 --offer a still more detailed treatment of the period. Walker, 1970which are useful in the classroom. Two volumes of the nearly complete Cambridge History of Science series present a shorter survey of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries: Two other books discuss the period of the Scientific Revolution as part of a longer sequence.

Dijksterhuis, The Mechanization of the World Picture trans. Clarendon Press, 1961 which starts with Greek natural philosophy, concludes with the seventeenth century. Press, 1960a work studied carefully by historians of science but readily accessible to nonspecialists, begins with the Scientific Revolution. Nearly everyone agrees that the basic reassessment of the place of the earth in the universe, the change from a geocentric to a heliocentric astronomy, was of crucial importance.

Press, 1957starts with the geocentric picture of the world, which it insists that we take seriously, and follows astronomy through Kepler. Years ago Francis R. Johnson, a student of Elizabethan literature who wanted to understand the references to astronomy that he found in literary works, like Butterfield proved that there is nothing in the history of science that is closed to the determined nonspecialist.

Johns Hopkins Press, 1937remains a good introduction to the Copernican revolution. More recently, another nonspecialist and distinguished literary figure, Arthur Koestler, composed The Sleepwalkers: Hutchinson, 1959a book rejected by many historians of science because of its deep hostility to Galileo, but also a book with many suggestive insights into Copernicus, Tycho Brahe, and Kepler, who is its central subject.

There are, of course, biographies of the leading astronomers. Schuman, what were the roots of the scientific revolution essayof Kepler, Max Casper's Kepler trans. Doris Hellman; What were the roots of the scientific revolution essay York: Mechanics, the science of motion, the central core of physics, was another crucial area of the Scientific Revolution.

Anchor, 1960; 2nd ed.

What were the roots of the Scientific Revolution? Essay

Norton, 1985 directed at a nonspecialist, nontechnical audience. Stillman Drake, a prolific scholar on Galileo, has drawn together the fruit of his many articles into a biographical study, Galileo at Work Chicago: It is a book intended for specialists, and though it is a suitable place to start the study of Galileo's life, it is not the place to begin the what were the roots of the scientific revolution essay of his work. Basic Books, 1968with articles on every aspect of Galileo's career and work.

His own introductory essay, with the same title as the book, is an excellent brief discussion of Galileo's contribution to science. Galileo's own works are all available in excellent English translations, the work of Stillman Drake.

The Roots Of The Scientific Revolution Essay

Drake has collected a number of what were the roots of the scientific revolution essay shorter pieces, which are particularly adaptable for use in the classroom, Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo Garden City, N. No other scientist of the seventeenth century is so readable, and since he directed his works, not to a scientific community, which scarcely existed at the time, but to a lay public that had been instructed in natural philosophy, a historian or student of the twentieth century can comprehend them readily.

For studies of Newton, who contributed massively to mechanics, see Section IV below. Optics, the study of light. Chicago Press, 1976concludes with a fine discussion of Kepler's major contribution to optics, his concept of the retinal image. Sabra, Theories of Light: From Descartes to Newton London: Oldbourne, 1967is exactly what the title promises, a study, not of theories of vision, but of theories of the nature of light, through the seventeenth century.

Alan Shapiro's monograph "Kinematic Optics: Yoseloff, 1955though not confined chronologically to the Scientific Revolution and not concerned with optics as a whole, nevertheless follows the growing understanding of one optical phenomenon with special attention to developments during the seventeenth century.