Homeworks writing service


The marriage of yesterday and today in the story of an hour by kate chopin

The description of this repression is backed up when Chopin gives us the reason for Mrs. For instance, it seems as if Chopin is showing us a social situation of the times with the woman as prisoner of her husband.

It is common knowledge that marriages are not always about mutual love between two people and during the time that Chopin was writing, this the marriage of yesterday and today in the story of an hour by kate chopin more often the case. Marriage was as much about monetary comfort, social status and acceptance as it was about possible love. There are no children mentioned in this story which makes me wonder if there was a sexual relationship between the Mallards.

It seems from the description that Mrs. Mallard has been trapped in this marriage for a long time even though we know she is young. How young is she? Even though I say she is trapped, do not misunderstand me: I do not think this marriage is arranged, instead that she has been coerced by her society to marry despite what she may want to do in her heart and soul. I believe she does love her husband, but it is possible to love a man and not be married to him.

This was not her case; if she were able meaning a man would agree with her decision and she did engage in a loving relationship with the marriage of yesterday and today in the story of an hour by kate chopin man who was not her husband, she would have certainly been looked down upon. Is her heart condition purely physical or is it also psychological and emotional? We know the stereotypes, as Chopin did, that women are hysterical, timid, weak, irrational.

Could it be that her heart condition is created by those tip-toeing around her in conjunction with her own emotional weaknesses? Before this point she is referred to as Mrs.

Mallard; she loses her identity and assumes a new and strange one. This woman is very in tune with this loss and even though her love for her husband keeps her from it, the freedom she feels when she thinks he is dead becomes unavoidable and enjoyable.

Chopin wrote the story and has given us a narrator who, if it is not Chopin personally, I believe to still be female. The descriptions and insight we are given into the character of Louise come from someone who understands her situation and is forgiving.

From the female perspective, it could be argued that her death was really an ultimate freedom from her unhappy marriage. If we assume that the narrator is male, could it be that her death was a punishment for her happiness at the death of her husband?

It is not as farfetched as it seems and raises many more questions as to the goal this story sets out to achieve. An example of this is the beginning paragraph where the reader gets the impression that this woman is going to be extremely upset that her husband has died in a train accident. The rest of the narrative begins to twist the story to the exact opposite of what the reader was waiting to have happen.

We find a woman who instead of being upset and heart-broken over her husband's death is experiencing complete joy over the death of another human being. Which, of course, now gives us the impression that she has been mistreated in this relationship and that, perhaps, this death is for the best. All this makes the reader justify the way the woman reacted, but in the end it's Mrs.

Mallard who dies upon seeing her husband alive and well. This ending definitely conjures up some questions that are difficult to answer. This was a great story. I like Chopin even though she is an ardent feminist. Through the first read several things stood out.

First you will notice how the woman of the story is simply referred to as Mrs. Mallard--an appendage of Brently Mallard---then when she is free she is referred to as Louise, her first name. Chopin is trying to say that marriage represses women and "bends the will.

The Kate Chopin International Society

She knows that this man loved her, but that is not enough for her to feel any love for him. Personally, I have never seen a working relationship that was totally one-sided. It is great that such a short little story could raise so many questions about the nature of relationships and the marriage of yesterday and today in the story of an hour by kate chopin they mean to a woman like Chopin. She considers any intention that bends the will a crime, even if it is kind.

There could be a thousand years of philosophical debate on that one point. In the way of characters I think Richards was an interesting the marriage of yesterday and today in the story of an hour by kate chopin. His role seems so small, perhaps intentionally so. Chopin is trying to show that women can get along just fine without having men interfere. The major theme of the story represents a disdain for the way that women are treated in some relationships, and to a certain extent in society as well.

It is hard for a male to give concrete examples of a female's place in society having never dealt with that stereotype.

However in this story there is so much repression. You would think that this woman had been locked in a basement and fed bugs by Brently. This is the story of a woman who finds out her husband has died in a train wreck. Body and soul free! The woman Louise dies from heart failure on the spot. I loved this little story--it takes a couple of twists and turns that makes the ending ironic and unobvious.

The year the story was written 1894 is included, and this adds interest to the content of the story. The fact that Louise recognizes her oppression from the male-dominated society of the time is interesting to me. Louise is obviously the character of interest--through her we see the social repression that women felt at the time. Louise represents all women of the time. The language of the story does a good job at conveying the emotions and feelings of the characters.

Although Louise represents all women, she is different. It shows that many women accepted perhaps blindly the situation of being controlled in their lives by their husbands.

After being told the news of his death, Louise goes to her room and looks out the window. The language here foreshadows the ironic happiness that she feels at being set free. When Brently returns, Louise drops dead. Chopin describes for us here a story of great irony. She introduces to us Mrs. We then meet her sister, Josephine, who is reluctant to be the bearer of bad news.

The marriage of yesterday and today in the story of an hour by kate chopin

We learn that there has been an accident, a railroad disaster, and that Mrs. In her solitude, we find her to be acutely aware of her surroundings and her senses, almost as if a dark cloud has been lifted from her soul and she can now live life to its fullest potential.

For moments, we can see through her eyes, feel her chest heaving and hear the birds chirping. She feels something that she has forgotten she could feel.

Expert Answers

She is feeling the clouds being lifted from her soul, she is illuminated, she is free. She is overwhelmed with freedom, opening up her arms to welcome it, letting it envelope her body and her soul.

She remembers her husband with kind memories, memories of time, memories that are now of the past. She is in the present and she is free! Her sister is concerned with her solitude and inquires of her well being. We learn that her name is Louise; she is no longer Mrs. Mallard, she is Louise, she has her own identity because she is free. She is reveling in her freedom, thinking of her freedom today and tomorrow, longing to have a lengthy life of her own.

She opens the door to her sister with a sparkle in her eye and a new sense of herself. They descend the staircase together, meeting Richards at the bottom. Someone is opening the door. We hear a scream from Josephine and see Richards attempt to conceal the living dead from the view of the heart patient. But it is too late. She had everything and nothing all in the same moment. This is a wonderful story, so well written and descriptive that we can be Mrs. The omniscience of the narrator allows us this.

We can see through her eyes, breathe through her lungs. We desire what she desires. This makes the story. The setting is perfect. She ascends the staircase to freedom, everything changes at the top of the stairs.

We descend the staircase with her and everything is taken away. She dies of the joy that kills, irony to the end. This short story grabbed my attention from the moment I finished the first sentence to the end of the story.

During the first few paragraphs I thought that she was very depressed and saddened from hearing about her husbands death. I detect that no one else knew of these feelings of contempt for husband but herself, or she would not have kept these feelings inside of herself. In the fifth paragraph, after just being told of her husband's death, she is very descriptive of everything that she sees at that moment, as if she wants to remember every detail of this moment.

When I think of these things that she the marriage of yesterday and today in the story of an hour by kate chopin describing they are happy scenes, scenes of serenity. This was my first clue that there the marriage of yesterday and today in the story of an hour by kate chopin more going on in this story than just someone who lost her husband. Throughout the story you get the feeling from the wife that she was probably controlled by her husband and that their marriage was not a happy one at all.