Homeworks writing service


The concept of critical thinking is a relatively new concept

Translate this page from English.

Print Page Change Text Size: T T T Critical Thinking: Identifying the Targets Abstract The goal of this chapter is to set out clearly what critical thinking is in general and how it plays itself out in a variety of domains: Richard Paul and Jane Willsen provide down-to-earth examples that enable the reader to appreciate both the most the concept of critical thinking is a relatively new concept characteristics of critical thinking and their specific manifestations on the concrete level.

It is essential, of course, that the concept of critical thinking is a relatively new concept reader becomes clear about the concept, including its translation into cases, for otherwise she is apt to mis-translate the concept or fail to see its relevance in a wide variety of circumstances. Is this a good idea or a bad idea? Is this belief defensible or indefensible? Is my position on this issue reasonable and rational or not?

Am I willing to deal with complexity or do I retreat into simple stereotypes to avoid it? Do I think deeply or only on the surface of things? Do I know how to question my own ideas and to test them? Do I know what I am aiming the concept of critical thinking is a relatively new concept Effectively evaluating our own thinking and the thinking of others is a habit few of us practice.

We evaluate which washing machine to buy after reading Consumer Reports, we evaluate which movie to go see after studying the reviews, we evaluate new job opportunities after talking with friends and colleagues, but rarely do we explicitly evaluate the quality of our thinking or the thinking of our students. But, you may ask, how can we know if our thinking is sound? Do the consequences always accurately tell the tale? In our education and upbringing, have we developed the ability to evaluate, objectively and fairly, the quality of our beliefs?

What did we learn about thinking during our schooling? How did we come to believe what we do believe, and why one belief and not another? How many of our beliefs have we come to through rigorous, independent thinking, and how many have been down-loaded from the media, parents, our culture, our spouses or friends? As we focus on it, do we value the continuing improvement of our thinking abilities? Important research findings indicate that we need to look closely at this issue.

Can we learn how to evaluate our thinking and reasoning objectively? These standards guide the divers in each practice session, in each effort off the board.

Center for Critical Thinking

Without these criteria and standards, how would the diver and the judges know what was excellent and what was marginal? Do we have parallel criteria and standards as we strive to improve our abilities, our performances in thinking?

There is nothing more common than evaluation in the everyday world but for sound evaluation to take place, one must establish relevant standards, gather appropriate evidence, and judge the evidence in keeping with the standards. There are appropriate standards for the assessment of thinking and there are specific ways to cultivate the learning of them. The research into critical thinking establishes tools that can help us evaluate our own thinking and the thinking of others, if we see their potential benefit and are willing to discipline our minds in ways that may seem awkward at first.

This chapter briefly lays out those tools in general terms and acts as a map, so to speak, of their dimensions. We present examples of student thinking that demonstrate critical and uncritical thinking as we define those terms. In other chapters, we identify approaches to teaching critical thinking that are flawed, and explain why they undermine the success of those who attempt to use them.

Important Research Findings First Finding: National assessments in virtually every subject indicate that, although our students can perform basic skills pretty well, they are not doing well on thinking and reasoning. American students can compute, but they cannot reason.

They can write complete and correct sentences, but they cannot prepare arguments. Moreover, in international comparisons, American students are falling behind. Our students the concept of critical thinking is a relatively new concept not doing well at thinking, reasoning, analyzing, predicting, estimating, or problem solving.

Textbooks in this country typically pay scant attention to big ideas, offer no analysis, and pose no challenging questions. Teachers teach most content only for exposure, not for understanding. Teachers tend to avoid thought-provoking work and activities and stick to predictable routines. Our fifth finding from research compounds all the others and makes it harder to change practice: If your elementary teacher presented mathematics to you as a set of procedural rules with no substantive rationale, then you are likely to think that this is what mathematics is and the concept of critical thinking is a relatively new concept this is how mathematics should be studied.

And you are likely to teach it in this way. If you studied writing as a set of grammatical rules rather than as a way to organize your thoughts and to communicate ideas to others, then this is what you will think writing is, and you will probably teach it so. By the time we complete our undergraduate education, we have observed teachers for up to 3,060 days. Unless we find a way out of this circle, we will continue re-creating generations of teachers who re-create generations of students who are not prepared for the technological society we are becoming.

Our Concept and Definition of Critical Thinking

It functions purposefully and exactingly. It is thought that is disciplined, comprehensive, based on intellectual standards, and, as a result, well-reasoned. Critical Thinking is distinguishable from other thinking because the thinker is thinking with the awareness of the systematic nature of high quality thought, and is continuously checking up on himself or herself, striving to improve the quality of thinking.

As with any system, critical thinking is not just a random series of characteristics or components. Critical thinking is based on two assumptions: Critical thinking implies a fundamental, overriding goal for education in school and in the workplace: As students learn to take command of their thinking and continually to improve its quality, they learn to take command of their lives, continually improving the quality of their lives.

Comprehensive Critical Thinking Has the Following Characteristics It is thinking which is responsive to and guided by Intellectual Standards, such as relevance, accuracy, precision, clarity, depth, and breadth. Without intellectual standards to guide it, thinking cannot achieve excellence. For example, the critical thinker will routinely ask himself or herself questions such as these about the subject of the thinking task at the concept of critical thinking is a relatively new concept What is the purpose of my thinking?

What precise question am I trying to answer? Within what point of view am I thinking? What information am I using? How am I interpreting that information? What concepts or ideas are central to my thinking? What conclusions am I coming to? What am I taking for granted, what assumptions am I making? If I accept the conclusions, what are the implications? What would the consequences be, if I put my thought into action?

For each element, the thinker must be able to reflect on the standards that will shed light on the effectiveness of her thinking. The thinker takes steps to assess the various dimensions of her thinking, using appropriate intellectual standards. The thinker is able, not only to critically examine her thought as a whole, but also to take it apart, to consider its various parts, as well. Furthermore, the concept of critical thinking is a relatively new concept thinker is committed to thinking within a system of interrelated traits of mind; for example, to be intellectually humble, to be intellectually perseverant, to be intellectually courageous, to be intellectually fair and just.

Ideally, the critical thinker is aware of the full variety of ways in which thinking can become distorted, misleading, prejudiced, superficial, unfair, or otherwise defective. The thinker strives for wholeness and integrity as fundamental values.

Many tend to instruct students with a technique such as mapping of ideas in diagrams or the concept of critical thinking is a relatively new concept two ideas, yet these ask little of the student and can readily the concept of critical thinking is a relatively new concept student and teacher to believe that such techniques will be sufficient.

If we know quite explicitly how to check our thinking as we go, and we are committed to doing so, and we get extensive practice, then we can depend on the results of our thinking being productive.

Good thinking produces good results. The following section highlights examples of legitimate, substantial, comprehensive critical thinking in a variety of contexts. These examples will provide the reader with concrete samples of the criteria, the standards and characteristics integral to genuine critical thinking. Critical Thinking at School Critical thinking has an appropriate role in virtually every dimension of school learning, very little that we learn that is of value can be learned by automatic, unreflective processes.

Consider the following example of two students engaging in reading the same story. We have chosen to make our example detailed, because we see this as the best route for providing specificity to otherwise vague generalizations about the relationship between reading and thinking. To simulate the task for you we present the passage without a title and one episode at a time as was done with the children. Episode 1 The stillness of the morning air was broken. The men headed down the bay. It was a very peaceful morning.

Colleen The men are going shopping. Commentary Stephen recognizes that there is insufficient information for explaining what the men are doing. On questioning, he tentatively suggests a couple of alternatives the concept of critical thinking is a relatively new concept with the information given, but indicates there are other possibilities. Colleen presents one explanation of the story, and seems fairly definitive that the men are going to buy clothes at The Bay, a chain of department stores in Canada.

On being queried she maintains her idea that the men are going shopping but offers an explanation inconsistent with her first one that they are going to buy clothes.

To do this she assumes that something concrete was broken, which could be replaced at The Bay. Episode 2 The net was hard to pull. The heavy sea and strong tide made it even difficult for the girdie. The meshed catch encouraged us to try harder. Stephen It was not a very good day as there were waves which made it difficult for the girdie.

Critical Thinking: Identifying the Targets

That must be some kind of machine for doing something. The net could be for pulling something out of the water like an old wreck. Maybe a type of pulley.